If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Ways of knowing for ‘response‐ability’ in more‐than‐human encounters: the role of anticipatory knowledges in outdoor access with dogs

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:


Geographical scholarship is increasingly concerned with how knowledges count in human–nonhuman relations, including questions of what it takes to achieve responsible practice, and the forms of expertise that shape corporeal encounters. This paper highlights how the outdoors comes to be known matters for the integrity of human and non‐human bodies performing and encountered in outdoor spaces. It examines some of the ways of knowing demanded in accomplishing responsible outdoor access with dogs, in terms of constituting response‐ability – or the capacity to respond – across species and geographical difference. Through mobile and visual ethnographic methods enabling episodes and repertoires of canine–human enactments to be witnessed and recounted, we identify ways of knowing the outdoors that exceed cognition of the formal scriptings of conduct, yet are crucial to preventing its transgression through engendering capacities to respond. We identify in particular the role of anticipatory knowledges, and argue that better account needs to be taken of the embodied preparatory and pre‐emptory ways of knowing that make the mutual doings of response‐ability across spatial and species difference possible. These encompass a set of temporally interleaving spatio‐corporeal competencies that render the crux time‐spaces of ‘irresponsible’ human–nonhuman ruptures preventable rather than merely recognisable. They work by shaping and being attuned to how dog and human bodies become articulate to each other in relation to the shifting ecologies, topographies, terrains and proximities of an outdoor excursion. Consequently, we raise the question of the work of responsibility done (or not) in terms of our human obligations to animals when attentions become focused on codified rather than the broader range of outdoor knowledges.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01059.x

Affiliations: 1: James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH. 2: Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TU

Publication date: March 1, 2012

Related content



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more