Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:

Abstract:

The journalistic norm of ‘balanced’ reporting (giving roughly equal coverage to both sides in any significant dispute) is recognised as both useful and problematic in communicating emerging scientific consensus on human attribution for global climate change. Analysis of the practice of this norm in United States (US) and United Kingdom (UK) newspaper coverage of climate science between 2003 and 2006 shows a significant divergence from scientific consensus in the US in 2003–4, followed by a decline in 2005–6, but no major divergence in UK reporting. These findings inform ongoing considerations about the spatially-differentiated media terms and conditions through which current and future climate policy is negotiated and implemented.

Keywords: United Kingdom; United States; climate science; content analysis; mass media; policy

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00769.x

Affiliations: Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, Oxford OX1 3QY, Email: maxwell.boykoff@eci.ox.ac.uk

Publication date: December 1, 2007

Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more