Analysis

Numbers versus nominalists
pp. 177-182(6)
Author: Salmon, Nathan

`P is true and non-Cartesian' is non-Cartesian
pp. 183-185(3)
Author: Cook, RoyT.

Superplurals in English
pp. 186-197(12)
Authors: Linnebo, Øystein; Nicolas, David

How to talk about unobservables
pp. 197-205(9)
Authors: Muller, F. A.; vanFraassen, B. C.

Are only mental phenomena intentional?
pp. 205-215(11)
Author: Nes, Anders

Reply to Nes
pp. 215-218(4)
Author: Crane, Tim

What is `conditional probability'?
pp. 218-223(6)
Author: Lowe, E. J.

The Simulation Argument again
pp. 224-226(3)
Author: Brueckner, Anthony

Coherentism and the symmetry of epistemic support
pp. 226-234(9)
Author: Shackel, Nicholas

Thoughts, oughts and the conceptual primacy of belief
pp. 234-238(5)
Author: Miller, Alexander

True, false, paranormal and `designated'?: a reply to Jenkins
pp. 238-244(7)
Authors: Caret, Colin; Cotnoir, AaronJ.

The importance of being designated: a comment on Caret and Cotnoir
pp. 244-247(4)
Author: Jenkins, C. S.

How probable is an infinite sequence of heads? A reply to Williamson
pp. 247-250(4)
Author: Weintraub, Ruth

Compatibilism can resist prepunishment: a reply to Smilansky
pp. 250-253(4)
Author: Kearns, Stephen

Prepunishment for compatibilists: a reply to Kearns
pp. 254-257(4)
Author: Smilansky, Saul

Smilansky's alleged refutation of compatibilism
pp. 258-260(3)
Author: Beebee, Helen

More prepunishment for compatibilists: a reply to Beebee
pp. 260-263(4)
Author: Smilansky, Saul

Reply to Brueckner
pp. 264-269(6)
Author: Campbell, JosephKeim