Sacred Sovereigns and Punishable War Crimes: The Ambivalence of the Wilson Administration towards a Trial of Kaiser Wilhelm II

Author: Kampmark, Binoy¹

Source: Australian Journal of Politics & History, Volume 53, Number 4, December 2007 , pp. 519-537(19)

Purchase options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$39.62 plus tax Refund Policy

More like this?

In this: publication
By this: publisher
In this Subject: History , Political Science
By this author: Kampmark, Binoy

Content Key:

- Free

- New

- Open Access

- Subscribed

- Free Trial

Abstract:

Conventional wisdom characterises President Woodrow Wilson as a progressive internationalist in the making of foreign policy, sceptical of international practices such as secret diplomacy and balance-of-power theories. An examination of the Wilson Administration's record in quelling Allied attempts to punish Kaiser Wilhelm II after the end of the First World War provides a contrasting view. The White House, leading figures in the State Department and a large grouping of prominent lawyers argued that punishing the German sovereign for waging war in violation of treaties would destabilise international order and lose the peace. Current American reluctance to participate in the International Criminal Court and fears of an undue intrusion of an international judiciary on the merits of foreign policy make an understanding of these reservations timely.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8497.2007.00472.x

Affiliations: 1: Selwyn College, University of Cambridge