Skip to main content

Order effects and recency: where do we go from here?

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Previous studies of auditor judgments have examined whether the order in which information is received affects their judgments. In particular, these studies have considered whether there is a recency effect which occurs when the disconfirmatory/confirmatory evidence treatment results in a final judgment which is significantly higher than the confirmatory/disconfirmatory treatment. More recent studies have investigated the circumstances when recency effects exist and when they are mitigated. The results of the studies are mixed. After the addition of two further studies (Arnold et al., 2000; Monroe and Ng, 2000) in this edition of the journal, the results are still mixed. The paper outlines the possible explanations for the mixed results across studies and some issues that need to be addressed prior to collection of further empirical evidence.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Auditor judgments; Evidence; Experience; Recency; Task complexity

Document Type: Original Article

Affiliations: 1: School of Accounting, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia, 2: Carroll School of Management, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA

Publication date: 2000-07-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more