Skip to main content

Dreams That Only Money Can Buy . . . Or, The Shy Tribe In Flight from Discourse

The full text article is temporarily unavailable.

We apologise for the inconvenience. Please try again later.


Subculture is defined as being distinct from mainstream society, a term coined in the 1940s. The article questions whether the idea of subculture as a form of resistance to the dominant culture is still useful when examining youth culture in the 1990s. Has subculture been so co-opted by the market-place that it has simply turned into "lifestyle", and is "authentic" resistance now a dream that only money can buy? Evans uses a Foucauldian model of resistance to analyse the subcultural tactics of ravers in the late 1980s, suggesting that resistance is now more subtle and complex. The article attempts to reconcile this with the Gramscian model of "repertoires of resistance". Evans concludes that we need a new model of subculture because we need a new dialectical model of culture, which is more heterogeneous and unstable. Foucauldian and Gramscian models of resistance are incompatible - each fit different examples of resistance at different points in history. Such subcultures are generally not studied in any serious, empirical way within cultural studies because of the state of British academia - in the field of popular culture it is cheaper to do theory than ethnography.

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: May 1, 1997


Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more