Comparison of the defect detection capabilities of flash thermography and vibration excitation shearography
The defect detection capabilities of transient thermography and shearography have been compared using optimum excitation methods for each technique: short pulse heating for thermography and vibration excitation using a piezoelectric transducer for shearography. A signal-to-noise ratio and limit of detection analysis has been performed on defect images obtained by the two techniques using the different excitation methods. Test samples considered in this paper are flat-plate samples made from aluminium, mild steel, stainless steel, CFRP and thermoplastic, containing flat-bottomed hole artificial defects of 20 mm diameter at depths ranging from 0.5 mm to 3.0 mm.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: UK Research Centre in NDE, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Publication date: 2010-02-01
More about this publication?
- Official Journal of The British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing - includes original research and devlopment papers, technical and scientific reviews and case studies in the fields of NDT and CM.
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Terms & Conditions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites