Skip to main content

Immigration, Rights and Democracy

Buy Article:

$32.95 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Abstract:

Arash Abizadeh has recently argued that political communities have no right to close their borders unilaterally, since by doing so they subject outsiders to coercion which lacks democratic justification. His conclusion is that any legitimate regime of border controls must be justified to outsiders. David Miller has sought to defend closed borders by distinguishing between coercion and prevention and arguing that the latter does not require democratic justification. This paper explores a different route, arguing firstly that the requirements of democracy do not provide us with practical guidance unless we also consider other values, such as rights, and secondly that being subject to coercion does not entitle one to democratic justification. These arguments suggest that Abizadeh is wrong to hold closed borders in need of democratic justification.

Keywords: ABIZADEH; BORDERS; DEMOCRACY; LEGITIMACY; MIGRATION; MILLER

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/th.2011.5812905

Publication date: December 1, 2011

More about this publication?
berghahn/theoria/2011/00000058/00000129/art00005
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
UA-1313315-19
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more