Interest and Excess of Modern Man's Radical Mediocrity: Rescaling Sloterdijk's Grandiose Aesthetic Strategy
Author: Oosterling, Henk
Source: Cultural Politics: an International Journal, Volume 3, Number 3, November 2007 , pp. 357-380(24)
Publisher: Berg Publishers
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
In my contribution, I adopt Sloterdijk's analysis of globalization as the megalomaneous or "hyperpolitical" installing of a total work of art (Gesamtkunstwerk). I rephrase his threefold (energetical, informational, and epistemological) "explicitation" of man's radical immersion in his own media as "radical mediocrity" and argue that this has become our first nature. But then, what is the political potential of Sloterdijk's merger of aesthetics with politics as based on the Bataillan principle of excess rather than lack and scarcity? Should we not differentiate between miserabilist and affirmative critique? This distinction is all but self-evident, because every new mediological explicitation eventually reproduces scarcity through forgetfulness. It depends on the critical difference between mediocrity and inter-esse, between plain comfortable life and self-reflective radical mediocrity. In the final analysis, the "psychological" surplus of generosity and the substance of creativity consist precisely of this self-reflective in-between. Therefore, any feasible critical reflection requires a downscaling of Sloterdijk's hyperpolitical understanding of being-in in terms of micropolitical art practices. I will concentrate on one possible answer to the critical questions that must be asked: wherein lies the possibility of resistance in Sloterdijk's recent analyses of capitalism?Keywords: PHILOSOPHY; ART; MEDIA CRITIQUE; ECOLOGY; MICROPOLITICS; GLOBALIZATION
Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.2752/175174307X226898
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content

Click here for Page Help