If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Resistance, Collaboration and the Early Modern 'Public Transcript': The River Lea Disputes and Popular Politics in England, 1571–1603

The full text article is temporarily unavailable.

We apologise for the inconvenience. Please try again later.

Abstract:

This article engages critically with recent contributions to the study of early modern social relations and popular politics which have drawn inspiration from the ideas of the anthropologist James C. Scott. It argues that, by adopting aspects of Scott's vocabulary, especially his notion of 'dominant' and 'subordinate' groups, historians have given undue emphasis to the role of social conflict. While arguing strongly in favour of interdisciplinarity, this article suggests that it is time historians move away from Scott's fixed categories. It uses the example of protests against the River Lea navigation in Elizabethan England to explore social relations as a series of unstable and shifting alliances given meaning by situation and personality.

Keywords: IDENTITY; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; POPULAR POLITICS; SOCIAL RELATIONS

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/147800411X13026260432951

Affiliations: Pembroke College, Cambridge, CB2 1RF, UK;, Email: mjc76@cam.ac.uk

Publication date: September 1, 2011

Related content

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more