Active Form of Neuroprotective Humanin, HN, and Inactive Analog, S7AHN, are Monomeric and Disordered in Aqueous Phosphate Solution at pH 6.0; No Correlation of Solution Structure with Activity
Abstract:A novel neuroprotective peptide, Humanin (HN), has a strong tendency to aggregate in phosphate-buffered saline. Here we attempted to reduce aggregation employing an aqueous phosphate solution, without NaCl, at pH 6.0 and low peptide concentrations wherever possible. Such a condition, though not fully physiological, allowed us to determine the secondary structure and molecular weight of the peptides. Comparison of a parent HN peptide, an inactive analog (S7AHN) and a 1000-fold more active analog (S14G-HN) showed no apparent differences in the secondary structure. These peptides were all disordered over the wide range of peptide concentration. Sedimentation analysis was done only for HN and S7A-HN and showed aggregation into soluble oligomers in 20 mM phosphate at pH 6.0. Aggregation was greatly suppressed in 5 mM phosphate at the same pH in terms of aggregate size, with the formation of smaller oligomers. Sedimentation velocity experiments at 60,000 rpm in 5 mM phosphate at pH 6.0 showed that both HN and S7A-HN distributed into soluble aggregates that sedimented to the bottom of the cell and low molecular weight species that approached sedimentation equilibrium. The mass of this low molecular weight species was determined by sedimentation equilibrium to be close to monomers for both peptides. Thus, these results clearly demonstrate that the active HN and inactive S7AHN are identical in structure and hence there is no apparent correlation between solution structure and biological activity.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: February 1, 2009
More about this publication?
- Protein & Peptide Letters publishes short papers in all important aspects of protein and peptide research, including structural studies, recombinant expression, function, synthesis, enzymology, immunology, molecular modeling, drug design etc. Manuscripts must have a significant element of novelty, timeliness and urgency that merit rapid publication. Reports of crystallisation, and preliminary structure determinations of biologically important proteins are acceptable. Purely theoretical papers are also acceptable provided they provide new insight into the principles of protein/peptide structure and function.