Testing Non-Additivity of Biological Activity in a Combinatorial Library

Authors: Ge N.; Cho S.Jin; Hermsmeier M.; Poss M.; Shen C.Frank

Source: Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening, Volume 5, Number 2, March 2002 , pp. 147-154(8)

Publisher: Bentham Science Publishers

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Combinatorial chemistry offers new opportunities to generate and analyze QSAR data. Traditional QSAR attempts to correlate activity with structure. With combinatorial chemistry, it is possible to correlate activity directly with the reagents used in a combinatorial library. If one can determine which reagents lead to the compounds of highest activities, it may then be possible to predict active compounds in virtual libraries of 10 6 to 10 10 compounds. This would greatly facilitate library design and provide confidence that the best compounds are being considered for synthesis. An important question is whether the activity of a product molecule can be considered as a sum of its components. This is referred to as additivity between reagents. If there is non-additivity, it is necessary to identify and include the non-additive terms in the model in order to improve QSAR models.

Presented here are methods for developing QSAR models relating compound activity to reagents and a method for detecting the second effects of side-chain non-additivity. If the reagents in a library are shown to be additive in their contribution to activity, simple QSAR based on additive models can be applied confidently to reagents. Testing non-additivity can also guide the synthesis of the library. If the contributions are shown to be additive then the strategy for library synthesis may be shifted to include many reagents of a given type but not to make all combinations. The result is more efficient use of resources. In the analysis of percent inhibition data of a combinatorial library an additive model using reagents as descriptors yields a R2 of 0.43. Application of this method is probably appropriate for HTS single point data while methods employing topological or pharmacophore based descriptors would be necessary to adequately model IC50 data.

Keywords: Combinatorial library

Language: English

Document Type: Review article

DOI: 10.2174/1386207024607347

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$55.10 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A