Differences in publication and dissemination practices between disciplinary and transdisciplinary science and the consequences for research evaluation

Authors: Kaufmann, Alexander; Kasztler, Andrea

Source: Science and Public Policy, Volume 36, Number 3, April 2009 , pp. 215-227(13)

Publisher: Beech Tree Publishing

Key:

- Free Content

- New Content

- Subscribed Content

- Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Modern science has become a highly diversified social system. Its diversity is not only attributable to the multitude of specialized subjects but also to different research styles. Disciplinary and transdisciplinary research coexist side by side. In transdisciplinary science non-scientists participate actively in research projects. Although it has become a very important part of science today, much of the practice in research evaluation is still based on the standards and customs of traditional disciplinary science. Our comparative analysis of three research fields: economics and botany, representing disciplinary science, and sustainability research, representing a more transdisciplinarily oriented field, showed that there are significant differences in publication and dissemination practices. From these facts we derive some conclusions about how research evaluation should be modified in order to be able to assess the results of transdisciplinary research adequately.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.3152/030234209X427121

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$6.66 plus tax Refund Policy