Skip to main content

Free Content Flow-Related Artifacts in MR Imaging and MR Angiography of the Central Nervous System

Download Article:
 Download
(HTML 46.4 kb)
 
or
 Download
(PDF 4,706.1 kb)
 
Artifacts are commonplace on MR imaging examinations. It is imperative for the neuroradiologist to recognize and understand the many MR imaging artifacts that can obscure anatomy and be confused with pathology. This review focuses on the most relevant flow-related MR imaging and MRA artifacts and presents them in a concise form. Multiple flow-related MR imaging and MRA artifacts are discussed along with the mechanism of formation, imaging appearance, and interpretative significance. Additionally, methods to rectify these artifacts and strategies to minimize them are discussed.

We include the following artifacts: 1) Ghosting artifacts replicate a “mobile” structure in the phase direction due to spatial misregistration that results from rhythmic motion. 2) Paradoxical or flow-related enhancement seen on the first or last image of a sequence is due to signal intensity from unsaturated protons moving into the interrogated field. 3) Vascular and CSF flow can create artifacts due to the change in the location of excited and/or unexcited hydrogen protons. 4) Intermediate signal intensity often arises in an area of slow flow and may be misinterpreted as thrombus or tumor. 5) Artifacts on 2D TOF imaging are common and may be caused by susceptibility artifacts, shinethrough, and reversed flow in loops and subclavian steal. 6) “Venetian blind” artifacts occur in 3D TOF imaging secondary to loss of flow-related enhancement as protons traverse the MOTSA volume and can be minimized by modifying the flip angle throughout the acquisition.

Knowledge of the mechanism, appearance, and correction of these artifacts is essential for the accurate analysis of MR imaging/MRA of the central nervous system.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: FE = frequency encoding; FLAIR = fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; FRE = flow-related enhancement; GRE = gradient-recalled echo; MIP = maximum intensity projection; MOTSA = multiple overlapping thin-slab acquisition; MRA = MR angiography; PE = phase-encoding; RF = radio-frequency; SE = spin-echo; TOF = time-of-flight; true FISP = true fast imaging with steady-state precession

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 December 2012

More about this publication?
  • Neurographics is the peer-reviewed, bimonthly educational journal of the American Society of Neuroradiology. The journal comprises articles selected from material presented at the ASNR Annual Meeting. Neurographics also publishes other high-quality submissions that are primarily educational and have a high emphasis on a pictorial approach. Neurographics offers CME credit for reading review articles and completing quiz-based self-assessment activities. CME credit for review articles may be claimed up to 3 years after an article's publication date. Visit https://members.asnr.org/webcast/content/course_list.asp?src=Neurographics to view all available CME courses.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Membership Information
  • Order a Print Copy
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more