Circadian Phase Delay Induced by Phototherapeutic Devices
Authors: Paul, Michel A.; Miller, James C.; Gray, Gary; Buick, Fred; Blazeski, Sofi; Arendt, Josephine
Source: Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, Volume 78, Number 7, July 2007 , pp. 645-652(8)
Publisher: Aerospace Medical Association
Abstract:Paul MA, Miller JC, Gray G, Buick F, Blazeski S, Arendt J. Circadian phase delay induced by phototherapeutic devices. Aviat Space Environ Med 2007; 78:645–652.
Introduction: The Canadian Forces has initiated a multiple study project to optimize circadian phase changes using appropriately timed phototherapy and/or ingestion of melatonin for those personnel on long-range deployments and shift workers. The work reported here compared four phototherapeutic devices for efficacy in effecting circadian phase delays. Methods: In a partially counterbalanced treatment order, 14 subjects (7 men and 7 women), ages 18–51 yr, participated in 5 weekly experimental sessions of phototherapy with 4 different phototherapy devices (light tower, light visor, Litebook, LED spectacles) and a no-phototherapy control. Phototherapy was applied from 24:00 to 02:00 on night 1. Dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) was assessed on night 1 and night 2. Subjects were tested for psychomotor performance (serial reaction time, logical reasoning, and serial subtraction tasks) and completed the Stanford Sleepiness Scale on night 1 at 19:00, 23:00, 01:00, 02:00, and 03:00. After phototherapy, subjects completed a phototherapy side-effects questionnaire. Results: All phototherapy devices produced melatonin suppression and significant phase delays. Sleepiness was significantly decreased with the light tower, the light visor, and the Litebook. Task performance was only slightly improved with phototherapy. The LED spectacles and light visor caused greater subjective performance impairment, more difficulty viewing the computer monitor and reading printed text than the light tower or the Litebook. The light visor, the Litebook, and the LED spectacles caused more eye discomfort than the light tower. Conclusions: The light tower was the best device, producing melatonin suppression and circadian phase change while relatively free of side effects.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2007-07-01
- The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine (ASEM) provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. ASEM is distributed to more than 80 nations.
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- Submit Articles
- 2011 Annual Meeting and Event Information
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites