Automated Determination of Bubble Grades from Doppler Ultrasound Recordings
Abstract:Payne SJ, Chappell MA. Automated determination of bubble grades from Doppler ultrasound recordings. Aviat Space Environ Med 2005; 76:771–7.
Introduction : One of the difficulties in the development of automated algorithms for the detection of bubbles in Doppler ultrasound recordings is that expert labels are only available on an aggregate basis, i.e., the expert provides a single label for a recording which may contain many bubbles. It is thus very difficult to determine whether an algorithm is correctly identifying the actual bubbles or simply identifying the correct number of events, but mislabeling some events that are not due to bubbles. Methods: The analysis presented here shows that the classification probabilities for the detection of bubble events and other artifacts can be determined if a large number of recordings are available. Discussion: Using a half-integer scoring system from 0–4 gives a bias of approximately 1–2% and a standard deviation that varies with the number of event sequences available, dropping from approximately 7.5% for 100 60-s recordings to 3% for 1000 60-s recordings. These values are larger if an integer scoring system is used, but using a scale finer than half-integers confers no extra benefit due to the fact that the expert labels the whole recording rather than individual bubbles. Conclusions: It is thus possible to estimate the classification probabilities with a reasonably high degree of accuracy, but difficult to show that one bubble detection algorithm is superior to another to any degree of statistical significance. Expert labels can be used to validate, but not to compare the performance of bubble detection algorithms.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2005-08-01
More about this publication?
- The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine (ASEM) provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. ASEM is distributed to more than 80 nations.
To access volumes 86 to present, please click here.
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- Submit Articles
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites