Free Content

The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty

Authors: Stilling, Maiken1; Larsen, Kristian2; Andersen, Niels T3; Søballe, Kjeld1; Kold, Søren1; Rahbek, Ole1

Source: Acta Orthopaedica, Volume 81, Number 5, October 2010 , pp. 570-578(9)

Publisher: Informa Healthcare

Buy & download fulltext article:

Free content The full text is free.

View now:
PDF 772.8kb 

Abstract:

Background and purpose Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is a highly accurate tool for assessment of polyethylene (PE) wear in total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, PE wear measurements in clinical studies are often limited to plain radiographs. We evaluated the agreement between PE wear measured with PolyWare software, which uses plain radiographs, and by model-based RSA, which uses stereo radiographs.

Methods Measurements of PE wear postoperatively and at final follow-up (after mean 6 years) on plain radiographs of 12 patients after cementless THA were evaluated with PolyWare software and the results were compared with those from RSA as the gold standard (Model-based RSA using elementary geometrical shape models; EGS-RSA). With PolyWare, we either used the final radiographic follow-up (PW1) only or both the postoperative follow-up and the final follow-up (PW2).

Results The 2D mean wear measured (in mm) was 0.80, 1.07, and 0.60 for the PW2, PW1, and RSA method. 2D intra-method repeatability was similar for PW1 and RSA with limits of agreement (LOAs, in mm) of ± 0.22, and ± 0.23, respectively. 2D inter-method concurrent validity was best between PW1 and EGS-RSA with LOAs of ± 0.55. For 2D linear wear measurements, the PW1 method had a clinical repeatability similar to that of RSA.

Interpretation PW1 is sufficient for retrospective determination of 2D wear from medium-term wear measurements above 0.5 mm, It alleviates the need for baseline plain radiographs, has a clinical precision similar to that of RSA, and is easy and inexpensive to use.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.506632

Affiliations: 1: 1Department of Orthopedics, Aarhus University Hospital 2: 3Orthopedic Research Unit, Department of Orthopedics, Hospital Unit West, Holstebro, Denmark 3: 2Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus

Publication date: October 1, 2010

More about this publication?
Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page