Costs and effectiveness of travoprost versus a dorzolamide + timolol fixed combination in first-line treatment of glaucoma: analysis conducted on the United Kingdom General Practitioner Research Database

Authors: Lafuma, A.1; Berdeaux, G.2

Source: Current Medical Research and Opinion, Volume 23, Number 12, December 2007 , pp. 3009-3016(8)

Publisher: Informa Healthcare

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and associated costs of travoprost versus a fixed combination of dorzolamide + timolol as first-line therapy for glaucoma according to data collected by the United Kingdom General Practitioner Research Database (UK-GPRD).

Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of ocular hypertension, glaucoma, or who had been treated topically by surgery or laser therapy were selected. Patients starting first-line treatment with travoprost or a fixed dorzolamide + timolol combination were included. Times to treatment failure were compared with an adjusted Cox model.

Main outcome measures: Cost and treatment failure defined as a prescription change (adding or removing a topical treatment, or initiating laser therapy or surgery).

Results: 56 612 patients were extracted from the database and 39 808 patients received at least one topical prescription for IOP-lowering (intraocular pressure) therapy. Of these, 639 were treated with travoprost and 387 with dorzolamide + timolol, as first-line therapies. No significant difference was found between patient characteristics. Patients were aged 70.0 years and 48.5% were male. At 1 year, treatment failure was experienced by 30.4% of patients receiving travoprost and 49.4% receiving dorzolamide + timolol (p < 0.001). The hazard ratio for failure was 0.79 (p < 0.03) less with travoprost, after adjusting on age, gender, comorbidities and duration of follow-up. Adjusted annual costs of glaucoma management were significantly (p < 0.001) lower with travoprost (£198.31) than with dorzolamide + timolol (£312.21).

Conclusion: This retrospective costs and consequences analysis study showed that travoprost is more efficient than dorzolamide + timolol as first-line therapy for glaucoma patients. Patients continued longer with first-line treatment when prescribed travoprost at a lower cost.

Keywords: COSTS; ECONOMICS; EFFECTIVENESS; GLAUCOMA; TIMOLOL DORZOLAMIDE; TRAVOPROST; UK-GPRD

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1185/030079907X242836

Affiliations: 1: Cemka, Bourg-la-Reine, France 2: Alcon France, Rueil-Malmaison, France

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$51.50 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A