Long-term clinical and cost outcomes of treatment with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 versus insulin glargine in insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients: cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK setting

Authors: Valentine, William J.1; Palmer, Andrew J.1; Lammert, Morten2; Nicklasson, Lars3; Foos, Volker1; Roze, Stéphane1

Source: Current Medical Research and Opinion, Volume 21, Number 12, December 2005 , pp. 2063-2071(9)

Publisher: Informa Healthcare

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $51.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term clinical and cost outcomes associated with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30/70, premixed 30% soluble and 70% protaminated insulin aspart in one injection) compared to insulin glargine treatment in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients failing oral antidiabetic agents in the UK, based on findings recently reported from the INITIATE clinical trial.

Methods: The CORE Diabetes Model, a published, peer-reviewed and validated model of diabetes, was used to evaluate life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, cumulative incidence of complications and direct medical costs over patient lifetimes. The model simulates the range of diabetic complications and disease progression within a series of sub-models (cardiovascular disease, neuropathy, renal and eye disease) based on published data. Baseline cohort characteristics (54.5% male, mean age 52.45 years, mean diabetes duration 9 years, mean HbA1c 9.77%) and treatment effects were based on INITIATE. Costs were derived from published UK sources. The analysis was run over a 35-year time horizon (patient lifetime) from a third party payer perspective. Costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: BIAsp 30/70 was associated with projected improvements in discounted life expectancy (0.19 ± 0.20 years) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (0.19 ± 0.14 quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]), as well as a reduced incidence of retinopathy and nephropathy complications, versus glargine. Total lifetime direct costs were £1319 higher with BIAsp 30/70 than with glargine leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £6951 per QALY gained.

Conclusions: This study is the first to address the long-term health economic implications of treating type 2 diabetes patients failing oral anti-diabetics with a biphasic insulin mix versus long-acting insulin. Our projections indicate that improved HbA1c levels with BIAsp 30/70 treatment are associated with improvements in life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy, and that BIAsp 30/70 represents excellent value for money compared to insulin glargine in the UK.

Keywords: BIPHASIC INSULIN ASPART; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; INSULIN GLARGINE; MODELING; UK

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1185/030079905X74989

Affiliations: 1: CORE – Center for Outcomes Research, Binningen/Basel, Switzerland 2: Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark 3: Novo Nordisk Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA

Publication date: 2005-12-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page