The Extreme Orient: The Construction of Tantrism as a Category in the Orientalist Imagination
Author: Urban H.B.
Source: Religion, Volume 29, Number 2, April 1999 , pp. 123-146(24)
Publisher: Academic Press
Abstract:
Although it has now come to be accepted as a basic part of the vocabulary of historians of religions, the category of Tantrism, as a singular abstract, and clearly defined entity is largely a product of nineteenth-century Orientalist and colonial discourse. Very quickly, moreover, this category was identified as the most extreme form of that tendency toward passion, licentiousness and moral depravity which was thought to characterize the Indian Mind. Indeed, we might say that Tantrism came to embody the extreme Orient, the most Other, that which was most diametrically opposed to the rational and progressive mind of the West. This paper traces the genealogy of the category of Tantrism within the British colonial imagination, as it was constructed, not only in Orientalist scholarship, but also in administrative writings and in popular Victorian novels. As we will see, the discourse about Tantrism and its sexual licentiousness was part of the much broader discourse about sexuality, which, as Michael Foucault and others have shown, pervaded late nineteenth and early twentieth-century British culture. Finally, this paper will then show the ways in which the Tantras came to be defended rationalized, and sanitized by certain more sympathetic scholars of the twentieth centuryabove all in the work of John Woodroffe. It is largely through the dialectical tension between these two extremesbetween the Victorian horror at Tantric licentiousness, and Woodroffes defense and de-odorization of Tantric philosophythat this category came to be inherited by contemporary historians of religions. Copyright 1999 Academic Press
Language: English
Document Type: Research article
Affiliations: Ohio State University, 334, Dulles Hall, 230 W. 17th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, U.S.A.:

Click here for Page Help