IngentaConnect Modeling Unconscious Gender Bias in Fame Judgments: Finding the P...

Authors: Draine S.C.¹; Greenwald A.G.¹; Banaji M.R.²

Source: Consciousness and Cognition, Volume 5, Number 1-2, 1996 , pp. 221-225(5)

Abstract:

In the preceding article, Buchner and Wippich used a guessing-corrected, multinomial process-dissociation analysis to test whether a gender bias in fame judgments reported by Banaji and Greenwald ( Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 68, 181-198) was unconscious. In their two experiments, Buchner and Wippich found no evidence for unconscious mediation of this gender bias. Their conclusion can be questioned by noting that (a) the gender difference in familiarity of previously seen names that Buchner and Wippich modeled was different from the gender difference in criterion for fame judgments reported by Banaji and Greenwald, (b) the assumptions of Buchner and Wippich's multinomial model excluded processes that are plausibly involved in the fame judgment task, and (c) the constructs of Buchner and Wippich's model that corresponded most closely to Banaji and Greenwald's gender-bias interpretation were formulated so as to preclude the possibility of modeling that interpretation. Perhaps a more complex multinomial model can model the Banaji and Greenwald interpretation.

Language: English

Document Type: Letter paper

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195 2: Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$54.38 plus tax Refund Policy

Modeling Unconscious Gender Bias in Fame Judgments: Finding the Proper Branch of the Correct (Multinomial) Tree