The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature
Author: Souder, Lawrence
Source: Learned Publishing, Volume 24, Number 1, January 2011 , pp. 55-72(18)
Publisher: Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
Abstract:
This review summarizes the literature of a subset of the published research and commentary on peer review - the ethics of peer review. It attempts to track the various ethical issues that arise among the key participants in peer-review systems: authors, editors, referees, and readers. These issues include: bias, courtesy, conflict of interest, redundant publication, honesty, transparency, and training. It concludes that debates over such issues as open vs. blind reviews continue unresolved but that new technologies offer some prospects for resolving old issues while they also may create new challenges.Document Type: Research article
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20110109
Publication date: 2011-01-01
- Editor in Chief: Alan Singleton
North American Editor: Diane Scott-Lichter
Reviews Editor: Pippa Smart
Learned Publishing is the journal of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, published in collaboration with the Society for Scholarly Publishing. The journal is published quarterly in January/April/July/October.
Learned Publishing articles are available free online to members of ALPSP and SSP.
ALPSP members: log in to www.alpsp.org. If you do not have a password contact info@alpsp.org
SSP members: log in to the Member Center using your membership username and password. Further information info@sspnet.org
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Business
- By this author: Souder, Lawrence

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert
Get Permissions