Publications as a measure of scientific advancement and of scientists' productivity

Author: Daniel, Hans-Dieter

Source: Learned Publishing, Volume 18, Number 2, April 2005 , pp. 143-148(6)

Publisher: Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers

Buy & download fulltext article:

The full text is free.

View now:

PDF 225.1kb

Or sign up for a free trial

Free trial available!

Abstract:

Robert Merton's norm of communalism states that academic scientists are obliged to publish their research findings; in order to ensure that credible knowledge is published, peer review is used for pre-publication evaluation of manuscripts. The present system of journal peer review has, however, been much criticized. The paper summarizes research on reliability, fairness and predictive validity of journal peer review. The review of the research literature concludes that journal peer review is valid and does in fact function as a quality filter. However, since there is a lot of ambiguity in the literature as well, pre-publication peer review should be supplemented with post-publication evaluation to find out which publications and scientists have contributed most to the scientific advancement.

Articles that cite this article?

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/0953151053584939

Publication date: 2005-04-01

More about this publication?

Editor in Chief: Alan Singleton
North American Editor: Diane Scott-Lichter
Reviews Editor: Pippa Smart

Learned Publishing is the journal of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, published in collaboration with the Society for Scholarly Publishing. The journal is published quarterly in January/April/July/October.

Learned Publishing articles are available free online to members of ALPSP and SSP.
ALPSP members: log in to www.alpsp.org. If you do not have a password contact info@alpsp.org
SSP members: log in to the Member Center using your membership username and password. Further information info@sspnet.org