Relationships between Techniques and Outcomes for Borderline Personality Disorder
Authors: Goldman, Gregory A.; Gregory, Robert J
Source: American Journal of Psychotherapy, Volume 64, Number 4, 2010 , pp. 359-371(13)
Abstract:Although a number of psychotherapeutic modalities for borderline personality disorder (BPD) have empirical support, it is unclear what aspects of treatment are responsible for improvement. The present study analyzes the relationships between different techniques and outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of dynamic deconstructive psychotherapy (DDP) for comorbid BPD and alcohol-use disorders. Video recordings of psychotherapy sessions at 3-month intervals were rated to measure therapeutic alliance and the relative frequencies of specific treatment interventions. Outcomes included measures of borderline symptoms, depression, dissociation, social support, alcohol misuse, parasuicide, and institutional care. Discrete sets of techniques were associated with reliable changes in specific outcomes, indicating that treatments for BPD should be tailored to the specific constellation of symptoms presenting in a given individual. The study findings suggest that treatments with a specified set of techniques, such as DDP, dialectical behavior therapy, mentalization-based treatment, schema therapy, supportive therapies, and transference-focused psychotherapy, may be helpful for different individuals, depending on their particular set of symptoms.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2010
- Since the publication of its first issue in 1947, the American Journal of Psychotherapy (AJP) has long been a leader in the publication of eclectic articles for all psychotherapists. Transtheoretic in reach (offering information for psychotherapists across all theoretical foundations), the goal of AJP is to present an overview of the psychotherapies, subsuming a host of schools, techniques, and psychological modalities within the larger domain of clinical practice under broad themes including dynamic, behavioral, spiritual, and experiential.
The Journal offers varying viewpoints on the "who, when, why, and how" of psychotherapy. The Journal also serves as a conceptual bridge using the developmental process to reconcile major psychotherapeutic paradigms of the past and present.
It is the intent of the Editor-in-Chief to have the Journal's audience extend to the entire therapeutic community of practitioners and their patients.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites