Economic Evaluation of Gemcitabine Alone and in Combination with Cisplatin in the Treatment of Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

Authors: Lees M.1; Aristides M.2; Maniadakis N.3; McKendrick J.4; Botwood N.5; Stephenson D.3

Source: PharmacoEconomics, Volume 20, Number 5, 2002 , pp. 325-337(13)

Publisher: Adis International

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of gemcitabine in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Gemcitabine was compared with best supportive care and gemcitabine/cisplatin was compared with three standard chemotherapies and four other novel chemotherapy combinations. Costs and effectiveness measures were based on resource and outcome data from previously reported clinical trials. All direct costs associated with NSCLC treatment were included and adjusted to year 2000 values.

Perspective: UK National Health Service.

Results: Gemcitabine plus best supportive care was associated with an incremental cost per progression-free life year gained of £5228 compared with best supportive care alone. In comparison with standard chemotherapies, gemcitabine/cisplatin was associated with an incremental cost per progression-free life year gained of £1751 versus etoposide/cisplatin and cost per 1-year survival gain of £5681 versus mitomycin/vinblastine/platinum. Incremental cost per tumour response was £2032 relative to etoposide/cisplatin, £5169 relative to mitomycin/ifosfamide/cisplatin and £6240 relative to mitomycin/vinblastine/platinum. Compared with four novel (newer) combination chemotherapies gemcitabine/ cisplatin showed cost savings in each case, with the same or better outcome. Thus, gemcitabine/cisplatin showed improved cost effectiveness and dominance. Sensitivity analyses showed the results were robust to variations to the values of key parameters.

Conclusion: Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin was assessed to be a cost-effective or cost-saving therapy when compared with best supportive care, standard chemotherapy regimens and novel chemotherapy combinations. Chemotherapy regimens containing gemcitabine therefore represent good value for money and efficient use of healthcare resources in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Keywords: Antineoplastics, therapeutic use; Cisplatin, therapeutic use; Cost effectiveness; Gemcitabine, therapeutic use; Non small cell lung cancer, treatment; Pharmacoeconomics

Language: English

Document Type: Original article

Affiliations: 1: M-TAG, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2: M-TAG, London, United Kingdom 3: Eli Lilly and Co., Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom 4: Eli Lilly and Co., Windlesham, Surrey, United Kingdom 5: AstraZeneca, Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom *

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$62.95 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A