Economic Considerations Related to Providing Adequate Pain Relief for Women in Labour: Comparison of Epidural and Intravenous Analgesia

Authors: Huang C.1; Macario A.2

Source: PharmacoEconomics, Volume 20, Number 5, 2002 , pp. 305-318(14)

Publisher: Adis International

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia with opioids are two techniques for providing pain relief for women in labour. Labour pain is comparable to surgical pain in its severity, and epidural analgesia provides better relief from this pain than intravenous analgesia; a meta-analysis quantified this improvement to be 40mm on a 100mm pain scale during the first stage of labour. Epidural analgesia also has fewer adverse effects. However, providing epidural analgesia for labour pain costs more.

The full cost of providing epidural analgesia can be divided into two components:

The baseline component may be constructed using hospital cost-accounting data pertaining to actual obstetric patients. The incremental component is constructed from a set of recognised complications of epidural and intravenous analgesia, associated incidence rates and estimates of the costs involved, from society's perspective.

The incremental expected cost per patient to society of providing epidural analgesia was calculated to be approximately $US338 (1998 values). This cost difference results primarily from increased professional costs (and is particularly sensitive to the method used to estimate the cost of anaesthesia professional services) and increased complication costs associated with epidural analgesia.

A rational social policy for providing labour analgesia must weigh the value of improved pain relief from epidural analgesia against the increased cost of epidural analgesia.

Keywords: Analgesics, therapeutic use; Epidural; Intravenous; Labour; Labour pain, treatment; Pharmacoeconomics; Pregnancy

Language: English

Document Type: Review article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 2: Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA *

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$62.95 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A