Economics of the Antithymocyte Globulins Thymoglobulin and Atgam in the Treatment of Acute Renal Transplant Rejection

Authors: Schnitzler M.A.1; Woodward R.S.1; Lowell J.A.1; Amir L.2; Schroeder T.J.3; Singer G.G.4; Brennan D.C.1

Source: PharmacoEconomics, Volume 17, Number 3, 1 March 2000 , pp. 287-293(7)

Publisher: Adis International

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the economic implications for transplant centres, Medicare and society of treatment of corticosteroid-resistant Banff Grades I, II and III acute kidney transplant rejection with the antithymocyte globulins Thymoglobulin or Atgam.

Design and setting: This was a cost analysis of a randomised double-blind multicentre clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of Thymoglobulin and Atgam that was performed at 25 centres in the US in 1994 to 1996.

Patients and participants: The study enrolled 163 patients, 82 in the Thymoglobulin arm and 81 in the Atgam arm.

Methods: Estimates of the cost of care from the initiation of rejection therapy to 90 days post-therapy were derived from various publicly available sources and applied to patient-specific clinical events documented in the clinical trial. Patients received either intravenous Thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg/day) for an average of 10 days or intravenous Atgam (15 mg/kg/day) for an average of 9.7 days.

Results: On average, Thymoglobulin provided significant cost savings compared with Atgam from the perspective of society [$US5977 (1996 values); 95% confidence interval (CI) $US3719 to $US8254], Medicare ($US4967; 95% CI $US3256 to $US6678) and the transplant centre ($US3087; 95% CI $US1512 to $US4667). The overall advantage attributable to Thymoglobulin was primarily due to savings from fewer recurrent rejection treatments and less frequent return to dialysis.

Conclusions: Treatment of acute renal transplant rejection with Thymoglobulin is a cost saving strategy when compared with treatment with Atgam.

Keywords: Antithymocyte globulin Merieux, therapeutic use; Antithymocyte globulin Upjohn, therapeutic use; Cost analysis; Immunomodulators, therapeutic use; Pharmacoeconomics; Renal transplant rejection, treatment

Document Type: Original article

Affiliations: 1: Pharmaco-Economic Transplant Research, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA 2: Quality Resource Management Inc., St Louis, Missouri, USA 3: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA 4: Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$62.95 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A