Cost Effectiveness of Ciprofloxacin plus Metronidazole versus Imipenem-Cilastatin in the Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Infections

Authors: Walters D.J.1; Solomkin J.S.2; Paladino J.A.1

Source: PharmacoEconomics, Volume 16, Number 5, November 1999 , pp. 551-561(11)

Publisher: Adis International

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the cost effectiveness of sequential intravenous (IV) to oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole (CIP/MTZ IV/PO) with that of IV ciprofloxacin plus IV metronidazole (CIP/MTZ IV) and IV imipenem-cilastatin (IMI IV) in patients with intra-abdominal infections.

Design and participants: Patients enrolled in a double-blind randomised clinical trial were eligible for inclusion into this cost-effectiveness analysis. Decision analysis was used to characterise the economic outcomes between groups and provide a structure upon which to base the sensitivity analyses. 1996 cost values were used throughout.

Setting: The economic perspective of the analysis was that of a hospital provider.

Main outcome measures and results: Among 446 economically evaluable patients, 176 could be switched from IV to oral administration. The 51 patients randomised to CIP/MTZ IV/PO who received active oral therapy had a success rate of 98%, mean duration of therapy of 9.1 days and mean cost of $US7678. There were 125 patients randomised to either CIP/MTZ IV or IMI IV who received oral placebo while continuing on active IV antibacterials; their success rate was 94%, mean duration of therapy was 10.1 days and mean cost was $US8774 (p = 0.029 vs CIP/MTZ IV/PO). Of the 270 patients who were unable to receive oral administration, 97 received IMI IV and had a success rate of 75%, mean duration of therapy of 13.8 days and a mean cost of $US12 418, and 173 received CIP/MTZ IV and had a success rate of 77%, mean duration of therapy of 13.4 days and mean cost of $US12 219 (p = 0.26 vs IMI IV).

Conclusions: In patients able to receive oral therapy, sequential IV to oral treatment with ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole was cost effective compared with full IV courses of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole or imipenem-cilastatin. In patients unable to receive oral therapy, no difference in mean cost was found between IV imipenem-cilastatin or IV ciprofloxacin plus IV metronidazole.

Keywords: Pharmacoeconomics; Ciprofloxacin, therapeutic-use; Metronidazole, therapeutic-use; Imipenem.cilastatin, therapeutic-use; Intra-abdominal-infections, treatment; Sequential-therapy; Intravenous; Oral; Randomised-controlled-trials; Cost-effectiveness; Resource-use; Antibacterials, therapeutic-use

Language: English

Document Type: Original article

Affiliations: 1: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital, Buffalo, New York, USA 2: Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA *

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$62.95 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A