Pharmacokinetically Guided Administration of Chemotherapeutic Agents

Authors: van den Bongard H.J.G.D.1; Mathôt R.A.A.1; Beijnen J.H.1, 2, 3; Schellens J.H.M.2, 3

Source: Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Volume 39, Number 5, November 2000 , pp. 345-367(23)

Publisher: Adis International

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

The current practice for the dose calculation of most anticancer agents is based on body surface area in m, although lower interpatient variation in pharmacokinetic parameters has been reported with pharmacokinetically guided administration. As chemotherapeutic agents have a narrow therapeutic window, pharmacokinetically guided administration may lead to less toxicity and higher efficacy than administration on the basis of body surface area.

Pharmacokinetically guided administration, using parameters such as area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), steady-state plasma drug concentration and drug exposure time above a certain plasma concentration, has been studied for many antineoplastic agents. Assessment of pharmacokinetic profiles allows the characterisation of relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and efficacy and toxicity. AUC appears to be more closely correlated with pharmacodynamics than does the dose per unit of body surface area.

In particular, the AUC-guided administration of carboplatin has been extensively studied, based on the close relationship between the renal clearance of the drug and glomerular filtration rate. Several formulae and limited sampling models have been derived to predict the AUC of carboplatin. The relationship between AUC and pharmacodynamics has also been studied for other anticancer agents, for example fluorouracil, topotecan, etoposide, cisplatin and busulfan, but all less extensively than for carboplatin. The pharmacokinetically guided administration of these agents needs to be investigated further before the use of alternative administration formulae can become standard clinical practice.

Prospective studies of pharmacokinetically guided versus surface area-based administration should be performed to validate pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships and to facilitate optimal dosage of anticancer agents in the clinic.

Keywords: Antineoplastics, pharmacokinetics; Busulfan, pharmacokinetics; Carboplatin, pharmacokinetics; Cisplatin, pharmacokinetics; Cyclophosphamide, pharmacokinetics; Docetaxel, pharmacokinetics; Epirubicin, pharmacokinetics; Etoposide, pharmacokinetics; Fluorouracil, pharmacokinetics; Idarubicin, pharmacokinetics; Iododoxorubicin, pharmacokinetics; Menogaril, pharmacokinetics; NSC 95580, pharmacokinetics; Paclitaxel, pharmacokinetics; Research and development; Teniposide, pharmacokinetics; Topotecan, pharmacokinetics

Language: English

Document Type: Review article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2: Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3: Division of Drug Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands *

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$57.95 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A