Authors: Ermer, James C.¹; Dennis, Kerry¹; Haffey, Mary B.¹; Doll, Walter J.²; Sandefer, Erik P.²; Buckwalter, Mary¹; Page, Richard C.²; Diehl, Brian¹; Martin, Patrick T.¹

Source: Clinical Drug Investigation, Volume 31, Number 6, 1 June 2011 , pp. 357-370(14)

Publisher: Adis International

Abstract:

Background and Objective Data on pharmacokinetic parameters of the prodrug stimulant lisdexamfetamine dimesylate via alternate routes of administration are limited. The pharmacokinetics of d-amphetamine derived from lisdexamfetamine dimesylate after single oral (PO) versus intranasal (IN) administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate were compared.

Methods In this randomized, two-period, crossover study, healthy men without a history of substance abuse were administered single PO or IN (radiolabelled with ≤100 μCi 99mTc-diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid and confirmed by scintigraphy) lisdexamfetamine dimesylate 50 mg ≥7 days apart. Serial blood samples were drawn to measure d-amphetamine and intact lisdexamfetamine at 0 (pre-dose), 15, 30 and 45 minutes and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose for PO administration and at 0 (pre-dose), 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose for IN administration. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed.

Results Eighteen subjects were enrolled and completed the study. The mean ± SD maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last measurable concentration (AUC_last) of d-amphetamine following PO administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate were 37.6 ± 4.54 ng/mL and 719.1 ± 157.05 ng · h/mL, respectively; after IN administration, these parameters were 35.9 ± 6.49 ng/mL and 690.5 ± 157.05 ng · h/mL, respectively. PO and IN administration demonstrated similar median time to reach C_max (t_max) for d-amphetamine: 5 hours for PO administration versus 4 hours for IN administration. Mean ± SD elimination half-life (t_½) values were also similar for PO (11.6 ± 2.8 hours) and IN (11.3 ± 1.8 hours) lisdexamfetamine dimesylate. TEAEs after PO and IN administration were reported by 27.8% of subjects (5/18) and 38.9% of subjects (7/18), respectively; all AEs were mild or moderate in severity, and TEAEs such as anorexia, dry mouth, headache and nausea were consistent with known amphetamine effects.

Conclusion IN administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate resulted in d-amphetamine plasma concentrations and systemic exposure to d-amphetamine comparable to those seen with PO administration. Subject variability for d-amphetamine pharmacokinetic parameters was low. Both PO and IN lisdexamfetamine dimesylate demonstrated a tolerability profile similar to that of other long-acting stimulants.

Keywords: Amfetamine, pharmacokinetics; Attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder, treatmen; Lisdexamfetamine, pharmacokinetics

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: 1 Shire Development Inc., Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA 2: 2 Scintipharma Inc., Lexington, Kentucky, USA

Publication date: 2011-06-01

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Pharmacology
• By this author: Ermer, James C. ;  Dennis, Kerry ;  Haffey, Mary B. ;  Doll, Walter J. ;  Sandefer, Erik P. ;  Buckwalter, Mary ;  Page, Richard C. ;  Diehl, Brian ;  Martin, Patrick T.

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers