Implications of the European Organisation for Research And Treatment Of Cancer (EORTC) Guidelines on the Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) for Lymphoma Care

Authors: Pettengell, Ruth1; Aapro, Matti2; Brusamolino, Ercole3; Caballero, Dolores4; Coiffier, Bertrand5; Pfreundschuh, Michael6; Trneny, Marek7; Walewski, Jan8

Source: Clinical Drug Investigation, Volume 29, Number 8, 8 August 2009 , pp. 491-513(23)

Publisher: Adis International

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $62.95 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a potentially life-threatening complication of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines recommend use of primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis if the overall FN risk to a patient is ≥20%, or if a reduction in chemotherapy dose intensity correlates with a poorer outcome. Many of the regimens used for treatment of lymphoma, including R-CHOP (rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone), are associated with an FN risk of approximately 20% or higher. Individual patient factors that may increase the risk of FN such as advanced age or advanced disease should be taken into account when assessing the need for G-CSF support. Predictive models are being developed to facilitate individual risk assessment. Additional anti-infective prophylaxis may be indicated in some settings. There is now much evidence for the benefits of G-CSF in reducing the incidence of FN and facilitating delivery of chemotherapy, including dose-escalated and dose-dense (interval-reduced) regimens. If given according to guidelines, G-CSF has the potential to reduce FN and related morbidity. Furthermore, by facilitating delivery of planned chemotherapy, use of G-CSF may potentially influence survival in the curative setting. Implementation of the EORTC guidelines will lead to a greater proportion of patients receiving G-CSFs, but the costs involved should be at least partly offset by a reduction in FN and its associated costs, including those of hospitalization.

Document Type: Review article

Affiliations: 1: 1 St George's University of London, London, UK 2: 2 Doyen IMO Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland 3: 3 Clinica Ematologica, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo IRCCS, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy 4: 4 Haematology Department, University Hospital, Salamanca, Spain 5: 5 Haematology, Central Hospital Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France 6: 6 Medizinische Klinik I, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany 7: 7 1st Department of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital, Praha, Czech Republic 8: 8 The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute and Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland

Publication date: 2009-08-08

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page