Ambroxol Lozenge Bioavailability: An Open-Label, Two-Way Crossover Study of the Comparative Bioavailability of Ambroxol Lozenges and Commercial Tablets in Healthy Thai Volunteers

Authors: Rojpibulstit M.1; Kasiwong S.1; Juthong S.1; Phadoongsombat N.1; Faroongsarng D.1

Source: Clinical Drug Investigation, Volume 23, Number 4, 2003 , pp. 273-280(8)

Publisher: Adis International

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the bioavailability of two 15mg ambroxol lozenges with a commercial 30mg ambroxol tablet.

Design: Open-label, two-way crossover study.

Method: Each formulation was randomly administered to 20 healthy Thai volunteers (ten male and ten female) with a 1-week washout period between formulations. After administration, serial blood samples were collected over a 24-hour period and the plasma concentration of ambroxol was subsequently measured using high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection after liquid-liquid extraction. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analysed by a noncompartmental pharmacokinetic model and compared between formulations using analysis of variance with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: The point estimates (90% CI) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) ratios between lozenge and commercial tablet were 1.07 (0.89 to 1.28) and 1.20 (1.04 to 1.40), respectively. The point estimate (90% CI) of the difference between formulations for time to Cmax was 0.40 (-0.20 to 1.00).

Conclusion: The two formulations under test were not bioequivalent based on the stipulated bioequivalence criteria. The bioavailability from the ambroxol lozenge might be better, since the 90% CI of the AUC0-infin fell outside the bioequivalence range, and its range was narrower. The difference in rate of absorption was not conclusive because ambroxol was delivered from the lozenge by two parallel processes, namely absorption via oral and gastrointestinal mucosa. The additional oral mucosal absorption might not only contribute more absorption but also introduce variability compared with that of tablet administration. The relative importance of oral versus gastrointestinal mucosal absorption of ambroxol from the lozenge formulation, and the clinical significance of this, requires further study.

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$62.95 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A