Cost Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention in a Belgian Context

Authors: Neyt, Mattias; Thiry, Nancy; Ramaekers, Dirk; Van Brabandt, Hans

Source: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Volume 6, Number 1, 2008 , pp. 67-80(14)

Publisher: Adis International

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $62.95 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy was traditionally applied in patients who survived a cardiac arrest or who experienced a symptomatic ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Its use in primary prevention (i.e. in patients who have yet to experience a serious arrhythmic event, but who are considered at high risk for sudden cardiac death) has become more common, and policy makers question whether ICD therapy should be reimbursed in these instances.

Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness of primary prevention ICD therapy versus conventional therapy from the perspective of the Belgian health insurance system.

Method: A lifetime 1-month cycle Markov model was constructed and populated with clinical and effectiveness data from the SCD-HeFT study and real-world Belgian cost data expressed in year 2005 values. Probabilistic modelling and sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: ICD therapy results in 1.22 life-years gained (LYG) or 1.03 QALYs gained. The lifetime cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios were euro59 989 (95% CI 35 873, 113 518) per LYG and euro71 428 (95% CI 40 225, 134 623) per QALY gained, respectively. A cost-effectiveness ratio <euro50 000 per QALY gained was obtained in 15.5% of 1000 simulations. Increasing the service life of the device from 5 to 7 years would improve the cost effectiveness to euro57 229 (95% CI 32 568, 106 410) per QALY gained.

Conclusions: ICD therapy may not be judged cost effective for the primary prevention of death in patients with a SCD-HeFT profile in the Belgian context using current technology and patient selection. A combination of price reductions and increased service life of the device may alter this conclusion.

Keywords: Cost effectiveness; Disease prevention; Implantable cardioverter defibrillators; Markov model

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Administratief Centrum Kruidtuin, Brussels, Belgium

Publication date: 2008-01-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page