Comparing the Preferences of Health Professionals and Members of the Public for Setting Healthcare Priorities: Experiences from Australia

Author: Wiseman, Virginia

Source: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Volume 4, Number 2, 2005 , pp. 129-137(9)

Publisher: Adis International

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $62.95 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Introduction: This article reports on a priority-setting exercise involving members of the general public and health professionals. The aim is to compare the healthcare priorities of these two groups, as well as their attitudes towards public involvement in priority setting.

Methods: A convenience sample of 373 members of the public attending two central Sydney, Australia, medical clinics were asked to complete a structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire. Forty-four purposively sampled healthcare professionals working in central Sydney completed the same questionnaire. Both groups were asked whether the preferences of the public should inform priority-setting decisions. They then had to allocate an additional (but fixed) amount of healthcare resources across competing programmes, medical procedures and population groups and their preferences were compared.

Results: The health professionals and members of the public strongly supported using public preferences to inform priorities in healthcare. Both groups expressed a slightly stronger preference for using public preferences to inform priorities across healthcare programmes and population groups than for medical interventions.

Discussion/conclusion: Considerable uniformity of preferences was revealed between the health professionals and the members of the public. However, it is argued that, even where the preferences of health professionals are consistent with and representative of those of the wider community, public involvement is important in terms of procedural justice, as it helps to legitimise both the process and the resultant priorities.

Keywords: Health policy; Patient preference

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Health Policy Unit and Gates Malaria Partnership, School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, UK

Publication date: 2005-01-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page