Free Content Student and Faculty Perceptions of Dental Hygiene Clinical Evaluations

Authors: Moore, W1; Bauchmoyer, S1

Source: Journal of Dental Hygiene, Number 1, Winter 1st January 2007 , pp. 21-21(1)

Publisher: American Dental Hygienists' Association

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

The dental hygiene program implemented a new clinical evaluation system using formative feedback with periodic summative grading. Formative feedback is provided in narrative form, fostering more open communication while maintaining the same high standard of care. Historically, clinical evaluation was accessed by assigning numeric grades for each patient treated. Faculty believed potential learning experiences were lost when students refrained from asking for feedback fearing points would be deducted from their grade. Currently, students receive formative feedback for the majority of cases and a numeric grade for every second or third case, depending upon patient classification.

Objectives. The objective of the study was to assess student and faculty perceptions regarding the change in the clinical evaluation system.

Methods. A 12-item, 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was administered to dental hygiene seniors (n =23) and clinical faculty (n =13). (Response rate was 88.5% and 100%, respectively.)

Results. One hundred percent of students and faculty consider learning to be more effective in clinic when feedback was provided between graded cases, while fostering a more comfortable learning environment. Ninety-one percent of the students report they were more willing to ask questions when they were receiving formative feedback. Ninety-six percent of the students and 73% of the faculty preferred the new grading system over the previous system, while 100% of both groups feel the change increased communication between faculty and students. Ninety-six percent of the students and 46% of the faculty believe they perform equally on both evaluation types. Only 19% of the students value self reflection while 100% of the faculty believe this helps the student assess the learning experience.

Conclusion. Faculty and students feel equally satisfied with the format, stating that formative cases allow for improved communication and feedback with an increase in cognitive learning opportunities.

Document Type: Abstract

Affiliations: 1: The Ohio State University.

Free content The full text is free.

View now:
download Student and Faculty Perceptions of Dental Hygiene Clinical Evaluations 5.1kb 
or
download Student and Faculty Perceptions of Dental Hygiene Clinical Evaluations 28.9kb 

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A