Complementary and alternative medicine in children with asthma

Authors: Orhan, Fazil; Sekerel, Bulent E.; Kocabas, Can N.a.c.i.; Sackesen, Cansin; Adalioglu, Gonul; Tuncer, Ayfer

Source: Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Volume 90, Number 6, June 2003 , pp. 611-615(5)

Publisher: American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Background: The popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), particularly for chronic conditions such as asthma, is growing rapidly, but little is known about its use in asthmatic children.

Objective: To evaluate the extent, characteristics, and possible predictors of CAM use in a group of Turkish children with asthma.

Methods: The parents of asthmatic children were invited to participate in a questionnaire-based survey of 13 worldwide and 5 local methods of CAM. Current asthma treatment, asthma exacerbations, emergency admittances and hospitalizations due to exacerbations, and parental education levels were investigated as predictors that influenced the use of CAM.

Results: Of the 304 asthmatic children (mean ± SEM age, 10.5 ± 0.2 years; range, 1-16 years), 49% (n = 150) had used some form of CAM previously, and 38% had used CAM within the previous year. The most popular forms of CAM were quail eggs (79%), herbal medicine (31%), Turkish wild honey (26%), speleotherapy (5%), and royal jelly (5%). The respondents learned about CAM through friends (61%), relatives (25%), the media (9%), and physicians (6%). Age, sex, and mother’s and father’s education levels were insignificant between the groups that used and did not use CAM (P = 0.40, P = 0.18, P = 0.15, andP = 0.09, respectively). The use of regular asthma treatment, the use of inhaled corticosteroids, asthma exacerbations, emergency admittances, and treatment score were significantly high in the CAM group (P = 0.006, P = 0.03, P = 0.008, P = 0.02, and P = 0.02, respectively). A significantly high percentage of respondents in the CAM group had considered using CAM for their child’s asthma in the future (P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Asthmatic children in whom the disease is not well controlled are more likely to use CAM as complementary therapy.

Document Type: Original article

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$28.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A