Therapeutic jurisprudence has the potential to enhance sensitivity to the public health and mental health ramifications of both investigations and hearings in the disciplinary context. In this article the authors explore the practical relevance of therapeutic jurisprudence considerations to the work of regulatory agencies that receive and make decisions in response to allegations of unprofessional behaviour by psychologists. They argue that the therapeutic jurisprudence paradigm has a useful role in enhancing investigations and decision-making, both in terms of providing potential prophylaxis of unethical conduct by other members of the professional community and in enhancing the insight of individual psychologists as to the causes and risks of their inappropriate conduct.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
Document Type: Research Article
Barrister, Melbourne, Australia and Lawyer Member, Psychologists Registration Board of Victoria and Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria
Psychologist, Melbourne, Australia; Immediate Past President, Psychologists Registration Board of Victoria; Immediate Past Deputy Chairman, Council of Psychologists' Registration Boards of Australasia
Publication date: 2004-12-01
More about this publication?