Electrocardiograms (ECGs) often are collected from sedated cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in drug safety studies to support investigational new drug applications. ECGs are evaluated either manually or electronically, and the quality of the ECG tracing can affect the quality of that evaluation. The body position of the subject sometimes is manipulated to eliminate noise or clarify ECG complex morphology, and typically multiple technicians collect ECG data over time. Both factors—body position and multiple technicians—could affect ECG quality. This study was designed to determine whether body position or multiple technicians affects heart rate, mean electrical axis, or ECG parameters (RR interval, P wave duration, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval (uncorrected and rate-corrected by using the Bazett [QTcb] and Fridericia [QTcf] formulas), P wave amplitude, R wave amplitude, T wave height, T wave height negative, and ST segment elevation). The results reveal minimal (coefficient of variation [CV] less than 10%) within-animal variation between body positions (ventral, dorsal, right or left lateral), with the exception of P wave amplitude (17.5%), R wave amplitude (23.7%), and ST segment elevation (43%). Minimal variation in ECG parameters (no more than 7%) was detected between technicians, across animals, and across body positions. These findings suggest that neither a change in body position to increase the quality of an ECG tracing nor the use of multiple technicians significantly affect the evaluation of quantitative ECG parameters, especially QTcb (0.1% CV) and QTcf (1.3% CV).
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Veterinary Science, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Syracuse, New York
Publication date: 01 May 2010
More about this publication?
The Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (JAALAS) serves as an official communication vehicle for the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS). The journal includes a section of refereed articles and a section of AALAS association news. The mission of the refereed section of the journal is to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed information on animal biology, technology, facility operations, management, and compliance as relevant to the AALAS membership. JAALAS accepts research reports (data-based) or scholarly reports (literature-based), with the caveat that all articles, including solicited manuscripts, must include appropriate references and must undergo peer review.
Attention Members: To access the full text of the articles, be sure you are logged in to the AALAS website.
Attention: please note, due to a temporary technical problem, reference linking within the content is not available at this time
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- For issues prior to 1997
- Institutional Subscription Activation
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites