Rhesus Monkeys with Late-Onset Hydrocephalus Differ From Non-impaired Animals During Neonatal Neurobehavioral Assessments: Six-Year Retrospective Analysis
Abstract:Background and Purpose: A recent case study indicated that a hydrocephalic rhesus monkey had abnormal response patterns in a standardized neonatal primate assessment. We conducted a retrospective study to determine whether this assessment could also differentiate neonatal rhesus monkeys that appeared normal but developed signs of hydrocephalus later in life from neonates with normal development and no evidence of hydrocephalus.
Methods: One-hundred eighty-two rhesus monkeys were assessed on postnatal days 7, 14, 21, and 30. As neonates, clinical signs of hydrocephalus or other illnesses were not evident in any animal. Six monkeys developed signs of hydrocephalus between 5 months and 5 years of age, and each received confirmed diagnoses of hydrocephalus at necropsy.
Results: Compared with colony norms, the monkeys that developed hydrocephalus had diminished orientation abilities, more muscle tension, less behavioral evidence of distress, and more pronounced responses to some reflexevoking stimuli, and difficulty in self-righting (day 7 only). Discriminant function analysis comparing the hydrocephalic animals with a matched control group provided a high probability of correct group assignment at days 7, 14, and 21.
Conclusions: Some as yet undetermined factor may predispose some monkeys to develop hydrocephalus, which may also be reflected in different scores on neurodevelopmental test items during early infancy.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: April 1, 2000
Comparative Medicine (CM), an international journal of comparative and experimental medicine, is the leading English-language publication in the field and is ranked by the Science Citation Index in the upper third of all scientific journals. The mission of CM is to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed information that expands biomedical knowledge and promotes human and animal health through the study of laboratory animal disease, animal models of disease, and basic biologic mechanisms related to disease in people and animals.
Attention Members: To access the full text of the articles, be sure you are logged in to the AALAS website.
Attention: please note, due to a temporary technical problem, reference linking within the content is not available at this time
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- For issues prior to 1998
- Institutional Subscription Activation
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites